ONOXIA vs Chatbase

A side-by-side comparison of ONOXIA and Chatbase for teams choosing a RAG chatbot widget — focused on EU data residency, languages, and built-in features.

Feature ONOXIA Chatbase
Entry price NZ$30 / EUR 15 / USD 18 per month US$19 per month
AI provider Mistral AI (Paris) + Qwen + Gemini OpenAI (US)
Data residency EU only (Finland) US (OpenAI infrastructure)
GDPR posture No cookies, SHA-256 IP hashing, DPA included OpenAI DPA + Chatbase ToS
Widget isolation Shadow DOM Iframe-based
Languages 28 bot languages with auto-detection Multi-language via model
Voice input Built-in (microphone in widget) Not included
Calendly integration Built-in (Professional+) Via webhook
Live human handover Built-in (Enterprise) Not in core product
Email agent (IMAP/SMTP) Built-in (Enterprise) Not included
Webhook tools HMAC-SHA256 signed, configurable per site Yes
Multi-site support Yes (1 / 3 / 10 by plan) Yes
Widget designer 9 brand colours, custom avatar, position Logo + colour

ONOXIA vs Chatbase

ONOXIA and Chatbase are both RAG-first chatbot widgets — both train on your documents and embed via a script tag. They diverge on where the data goes and what comes built in.

Comparison

| Feature | ONOXIA | Chatbase | | --- | --- | --- | | Entry price | NZ$30 / EUR 15 / USD 18 per month | US$19 per month | | AI provider | Mistral AI (Paris) + Qwen + Gemini | OpenAI (US) | | Data residency | EU only (Finland) | US (OpenAI infrastructure) | | GDPR posture | No cookies, SHA-256 IP hashing, DPA included | OpenAI DPA + Chatbase ToS | | Widget isolation | Shadow DOM | Iframe-based | | Languages | 28 bot languages with auto-detection | Multi-language via model | | Voice input | Built-in (microphone in widget) | Not included | | Calendly integration | Built-in (Professional+) | Via webhook | | Live human handover | Built-in (Enterprise) | Not in core product | | Email agent (IMAP/SMTP) | Built-in (Enterprise) | Not included | | Webhook tools | HMAC-SHA256 signed, configurable per site | Yes | | Multi-site support | Yes (1 / 3 / 10 by plan) | Yes | | Widget designer | 9 brand colours, custom avatar, position | Logo + colour |

When to pick each

Pick ONOXIA if EU data residency is non-negotiable, you want voice input and live handover as part of the platform rather than as integrations, and you serve customers in multiple languages where bot quality matters (28 supported, auto-detected per visitor).

Pick Chatbase if you are a US team comfortable with OpenAI processing, want the lowest entry price, and do not need handover, voice, or email-agent capabilities.

On the AI stack

ONOXIA routes inference through Mistral AI in Paris for European traffic — a sovereign EU AI provider — and through Qwen or Gemini for Asia-Pacific. Chatbase uses OpenAI for all queries, meaning every visitor message and every retrieved document chunk traverses OpenAI's US infrastructure. For a customer who has spent six months getting their auditor to sign off on a "no transatlantic data transfer" position, this is a hard constraint, not a preference.

On built-in features vs add-ons

ONOXIA ships voice input, Calendly booking, live human handover, an IMAP/SMTP email agent, and 28 languages in the platform. Chatbase delivers a focused RAG chatbot with webhooks; equivalent capabilities require third-party integration work. Both are valid approaches — ONOXIA bets that customers want a complete out-of-the-box widget; Chatbase bets they prefer a slim core and external glue.

See also